(1) The general rule is that, where permitted by the substantive law, an applicant may include in an application for an administrative order a claim for any other relief or remedy that —
(a) arises out of; or
(b) is related or connected to,
the subject matter of an application for an administrative order.
(2) In particular the court may, on a claim for judicial review or for relief under the Constitution award —
(a) damages;
(b) restitution; or
(c) an order for return of property to the claimant, if the —
(i) claimant has included in the claim form a claim for any such remedy arising out of any matter to which the claim for an administrative order relates, or
(ii) facts set out in the evidence or statement of case justify the granting of such remedy or relief, and
(iii) court is satisfied that, at the time when the application was made the claimant could have issued a claim for such remedy.
(3) The court may however at any stage —
(a) direct that any claim for other relief be dealt with separately from the claim for an administrative order; or
(b) direct that the whole application be dealt with as a claim and give appropriate directions under Parts 26 and 27; and
(c) in either case, make any order it considers just as to costs that have been wasted because of the unreasonable use of the procedure under this Part.