(1) A cross-examiner may not, except as provided by this section, in cross-examination of a witness, use a previous representation alleged to have been made by a person other than the witness.
(2) Where evidence of such a representation, pursuant to subsection (1), has been admitted into evidence, or the court is satisfied that it will be admitted into evidence, the cross-examiner may question the witness about it and its contents.
(3) Where—
(a) a representation referred to in subsection (2) is recorded in a document; and
(b) evidence of the representation has not been admitted and the court is not satisfied that, if it were to be adduced, it would be admitted,
the document may only be used in the circumstances set out in sub-section (4).
(4) The circumstances referred to in subsection (3) are as follows—
(a) that the document may be produced to the witness;
(b) that the witness may be asked whether, having examined the contents of the document, he or she adheres to the evidence that he or she has given; and
(c) that neither the cross-examiner nor the witness shall identify the document or disclose its contents.
(5) A document used as mentioned in subsection (4) may be marked for identification.