(1) A witness may be cross-examined about a prior inconsistent statement alleged to have been made by the witness if—
(a) complete particulars of the statement have been given to the witness; or
(b) a document containing the record of the statement has been shown to the witness.
(2) If, in cross-examination, a witness does not admit that he or she has made a prior inconsistent statement, the cross-examiner shall not adduce evidence of the statement otherwise than from the witness unless, in the cross-examination, the cross-examiner—
(a) informed the witness of enough of the making of the statement to enable the witness to identify the statement; and
(b) drew the attention of the witness to so much of the statement as is inconsistent with the evidence of the witness.
(3) For the purposes of adducing the evidence pursuant to sub-section (2), the cross examiner may re-open his or her case.