(1) Any interested person or any interested group of producers or consumers may institute proceedings in the Court to prevent, in respect of geographical indication—
(a) the use of any means in the designation or presentation of a good that indicates or suggests that the good in question originates in a geographical area other than the true place of origin, in a manner which misleads the public as to the geographical origin of the good;
(b) any use which constitutes an act of unfair competition within the meaning of Article 10bis of the Paris Convention contained in the Schedule;
(c) the use of a geographical indication identifying wines for wines not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question or identifying spirits for spirits not originating in the place indicated by the geographical indication in question, even where the true origin of the goods is indicated or the geographical indication is used in translating or accompanied by expressions such as “kind”, “type”, “style”, “imitation” or the like.
(2) In proceedings under this section the Court may issue an injunction, award damages or grant any other remedy or relief as it may deem fit.